Comment Home / Reviews & Opinions

Social networking and faith identity

Is it even possible to sum up one's spiritual identity in 100 characters or less?

The recent Washington Post article titled "Soul-Searching on Facebook" addressed how one question facing people who are setting up their Facebook profiles ("Religious views:") has sparked all sorts of quandary and deep thought—surprising, in a cyber-venue which otherwise elicits light-hearted communications and flippant retorts. Though many simply do not answer the question, over 150 million of Facebook's 250 million users fill it in with something. Summing up one's spiritual identity in 100 characters or less is difficult, but the very nature of the medium requires it, unless one is to check one's beliefs at the gateway. But this spiritual sense is part of one's identity—and apparently a big part, for many people. So how do we answer such a question in virtual life?

Unsurprisingly, the most common answers are "Christian" and various subcategories thereof ("Protestant," "Catholic" and specific denominations). Next is "Islam," followed by "Atheist." Other surprisingly popular answers: "Jedi," "Seguidor del Wiccanismo" (Spanish for "follower of Wiccan"), and "Heavy Metal." Interestingly, quite a number of people online identify themselves as "Amish." It seems an oxymoron, as if these people were being facetious. Perhaps this segment of the user base represents Amish young people in their exploratory period of living outside the community, which no doubt includes trying modern technology.

The free-form field is great, because it doesn't force people into a multiple-choice box but allows them to get creative. Here are some of the more interesting answers people have given: "Love God, Love Others, Change the World;" "Pastafarian" (a reference to the spoof religion that worships the "Flying Spaghetti Monster"); "Matthew 25" (a passage in which Jesus calls his disciples to feed the hungry, clothe the poor and visit the imprisoned); "Agnostic, but accepting offers;" "I barely believe I exist;" and "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously" (a grammatically correct but meaningless sentence chosen to represent how someone's faith could at one moment seem to make sense, and in the next, not). Among my own Facebook friends, I've found these: "a seeker of beauty, experience and the Divine;" "yes;" "Branch Davidian" (tongue firmly in cheek); and this quote from Jane Austen: "Everybody likes to go their own way—to choose their own time and manner of devotion."

When faced with a question that requires us to coalesce complex thoughts and doubt-filled commitments into a single phrase, perhaps the "It's Complicated" answer (one of the options available for "Relationship Status") would fit many of us well. Some people would want to put an asterisk with their faith identity, to point out to their Facebook friends that they aren't like all those other stereotypical Catholics or Evangelicals or whatever.

It seems our beliefs are more nuanced these days than in the past. Perhaps that is due in part to our greater exposure through the Internet to people of differing religious views. Walls between denominations have been dissolving. Many Christians today have participated in multiple different congregations of varying stripes. Furthermore, the postmodern milieu in which we live makes many of us hesitant to stake our claim on just one denomination above all others.

Social networking sites like Facebook sometimes enable people to identify more closely with a particular small spiritual (or political) niche, but I believe they also free us up to find commonality with others. The interesting question is this: how do we represent this core dimension of ourselves to others in a curtailed fashion such that it opens doors to conversation, rather than closing them and putting up walls? The response of one of my friends points to this difficulty: "Is 'views' the right word?"

I interface with so many different people on Facebook—people who knew me from work, school, church, community and so on. I could not think of one single answer that would be how I'd want to represent my faith to all of them, so I left it blank. I might still someday come up with a great pithy answer, but for now, I'm not expressing my religious views online in Twitter-like succinctness. I'm online all over the place expressing my faith, but if people want to know what I believe, they've got to get to know me better than just Facebooking with me. Sitting down over a cup of coffee would be preferable.

Rosie Perera Rosie Perera
Rosie Perera is a writer, teacher/tutor, photographer, lay preacher, and all-round computer geek. ... read more »

Posted in Religion, Tech.

Add Your Comments


Copyright © 1974-2012 Cardus. All Rights Reserved.

| More

Feature Essays

  1. If Wishing Made it So: Teaching Students to Make Change

    May 14, 2012 | Gloria Stronks and Julia Stronks

    Parents and teachers want children to have the skills to make a difference. But what can we teach to help them survive their teen years, 20s, and 30s with convictions and charac...

Reviews & Opinions

  1. Morality, markets, and Michael Sandel

    May 18, 2012 | Nick Spencer

    In Santa Ana in California prisoners can buy a cell upgrade. In Dallas, Texas, underachieving children are paid to read books. These are, alas, some of the saner and less offens...
  2. Faith in China?

    May 16, 2012 | Joel Carpenter

    How striking to hear a well-known Chinese intellectual insist that the Christianity he saw in the villages of Yunnan, in rugged southwest China, is now as indigenous as the regi...

Six Questions

  1. Saying "there is not enough time" is heresy

    May 2, 2012 | Stephanie Gehring

    SIX QUESTIONS . . . The new culture I am making is an attempt to say hold still and look at this.

Cardus Blog

  1. Broken Union

    May 18, 2012 | Josh Reinders

    When the Quebec student protests started, my earliest feelings were of sympathy. These were fellow student, with whom I felt a kinship. Finally someone had taken up arms against...
  2. Writing Life

    May 17, 2012 | Milton Friesen

    My children surprised me last week with a ticket for the Miriam Toews luncheon here in Hamilton. Toews was going to be reading from her latest novel, Irma Voth, and taking quest...

Print Issue

  1. March 2012: Legacies
    Comment Magazine - Legacies Our culture does not know how to deal with legacies. We either treat the dead with some combination of awe and fear, or we think of our forebears as unworthy of remembrance, to ...