Comment Home / Reviews & Opinions

A Warning Against "Rights" Balkanization

Racism in Ontario is pervasive. So said Stephen Lewis in his hurriedly concocted report on that topic presented to the Ontario government. Quite predictably, his recommendations focused mostly on what is to be done by the state and its agencies. The urge to politicize society is a telling symptom of our age. This is put into effect, as recommended in the Lewis report, by developing an extensive program of entitlements intended to stamp out discrimination. But in reality, these entitlements establish a system of state-sanctioned racism and reverse discrimination.

Shelby Steele is an American black who has issued a strong warning against this direction in public policy in his article "The New Sovereignty: Grievance Groups Have Become Nations Unto Themselves" (Harper's Magazine, July 1992). We are wise to pay careful heed to his advice.

Steele places the beginning of "one of the most dramatic social experiments" in U.S. history, as he calls it, in the late 1960s when the federal government began to expand the concept of entitlements. "Rights to justice and to government benefits were henceforth to be extended not simply to individuals but to racial, ethnic and other groups" with the intent to redress past grievances. Steele believes that much good has come out of the early civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King and others. It had the effect of restoring the constitutional rights of blacks and other minorities.

What is now happening, however, is that a special kind of power is bestowed "upon any group that is able to construct itself around a perceived grievance." This new "sovereignty" has spawned a host of entitlement-demanding blocs of aggrieved citizens. Steele mentions the example of the development at university campuses in which aggrieved groups (blacks, women, Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans, gays, lesbians) have been lobbying for separate studies and separate facilities. But he sees this development as setting the stage for "precisely the racial, gender, and ethnic divisiveness that, back in the Sixties, we all said we wanted to move beyond."

Similar developments have occurred in many other areas of American society, including in the workplace where a complicated system of affirmative action has been put in place. Whereas initially the purpose was integration and removal of the barriers of race and gender, Steele writes that integration is now "anathema to grievance groups for precisely the same reason it was anathema to racist whites in the civil rights era: because it threatened their collective entitlement by insisting that no group be entitled over another. Power is where it's at today—power to set up the organization, attract the following, run the fiefdom."

Steele is convinced that the proliferating entitlement programs, based on race, gender, or some other group grievance, are antidemocratic and socially destructive. In contrast, he advocates a form of integration that includes

all citizens into the same sphere of rights, the same range of opportunities and possibilities that our Founding Fathers themselves enjoyed. Integration is not social engineering or group entitlements; it is a fundamental absence of arbitrary barriers to freedom... .Understood in this light, collective entitlements are as undemocratic as racial and gender discrimination, and a group grievance is no more a justification for entitlement than the notion of white supremacy was at an earlier time. We are wrong to think of democracy as a gift of freedom; it is really a kind of discipline that avails freedom. Sometimes its enemy is racism and sexism; other times the enemy is our expedient attempts to correct these ills.

Steele's article deserves wide reading, especially in Canada where social engineering types are now busily engaged in reconstituting social relations by means of a complex array of state-enforced affirmative action programs. As Steele points out, what must be done is not to establish new kinds of sovereignty and entitlements in the name of victimhood, but to accept responsibility and freedom in a society where true integration is cherished and accommodated.

Harry Antonides Harry Antonides
Harry Antonides is the founding editor of Comment. ... read more »


Add Your Comments


Copyright © 1974-2012 Cardus. All Rights Reserved.

| More

Feature Essays

  1. If Wishing Made it So: Teaching Students to Make Change

    May 14, 2012 | Gloria Stronks and Julia Stronks

    Parents and teachers want children to have the skills to make a difference. But what can we teach to help them survive their teen years, 20s, and 30s with convictions and charac...

Reviews & Opinions

  1. Do Not Open—No User Serviceable Parts Inside

    May 22, 2012 | David Greusel

    Why do so many of us have to work where the windows don't open? Engineers, architects, and lawyers have their reasons, but must workplaces be less humane than homes?
  2. Morality, markets, and Michael Sandel

    May 18, 2012 | Nick Spencer

    In Santa Ana in California prisoners can buy a cell upgrade. In Dallas, Texas, underachieving children are paid to read books. These are, alas, some of the saner and less offens...

Six Questions

  1. Saying "there is not enough time" is heresy

    May 2, 2012 | Stephanie Gehring

    SIX QUESTIONS . . . The new culture I am making is an attempt to say hold still and look at this.

Cardus Blog

  1. Plus ca change

    May 22, 2012 | Peter Stockland

    On today's 100th day of protests by Quebec students, Journal de Montreal columnist Richard Martineau offers a scabrous depiction of his province. Citing former Laval University ...
  2. Broken Union

    May 18, 2012 | Josh Reinders

    When the Quebec student protests started, my earliest feelings were of sympathy. These were fellow student, with whom I felt a kinship. Finally someone had taken up arms against...

Print Issue

  1. March 2012: Legacies
    Comment Magazine - Legacies Our culture does not know how to deal with legacies. We either treat the dead with some combination of awe and fear, or we think of our forebears as unworthy of remembrance, to ...