Comment Home / Reviews & Opinions

"Globalization and Grace": public theology bridging global disparity

What is the relationship between confessional theology and public theology? That is, how does the confessional inform and influence the public?
BOOK REVIEW: Max L. Stackhouse, Globalization and Grace (God and Globalization: Religion and Powers of the Common Life, Volume 4). New York: Continuum, 2007. Cloth, 254 pages. List price: US$37.95/C$46.95.
God & Globalization

A few months ago, the New York Times ran a headline article, "Stifled, Egypt's Young Turn to Islamic Fervor." The growth of fundamentalist religion, the article argues, is directly related to civil and economic prosperity of the state. The subtext was clear: people who live happy and productive lives don't need religion. As the tired old Marxian argument goes, religion is merely a crutch for those of us who can't quite seem to make it. If you can't afford video games, you go to afternoon prayer.

Those who have followed Max Stackhouse's God and Globalization series found the four-volume series a breath of fresh air in a stifling, secularist climate of international relations. Much to Stackhouse's credit, these volumes cover an area of global relations rarely given attention prior to September, 2001. The series straddles September 11th, and serves as both the context and beneficiary of some of the excellent work that followed. If you've waited the five years in anticipation of the fourth volume, you won't be disappointed.

Previous volumes in the series trace the application of public theology to phenomena commonly thought of as either facilitators, or significant recipients of the new patterns of globalization. This includes thinking on the family, war, global markets, media, ecology, technology, and more. While this conception of public theology suggests remarkable and provocative ideas, one major question remains unanswered in each of the volumes. What is the relationship between confessional theology and public theology? That is, how does the confessional inform and influence the public?

This final volume in the series, Globalization and Grace, addresses this question. In this monograph, Stackhouse offers an introductory approach to "public theology," and its history, meaning, and Christian content. In chapters three through five, Stackhouse draws out a robust confessional framework he intends to reflect the themes of creation, fall and redemption, though he labels these as creation, providence and salvation. He attempts to illustrate that within this Christian theology a broader, more inclusive engagement of first principles can be made at a global level. It is in the end goal of this public theology that I am most interested.

However, it is here that Stackhouse's straightforward theology begins to become unstable. How does public theology relate to globalization, and its constituent sub-disciplines such as economics, politics, law, and sociology? Stackhouse correctly assesses that globalization should not be confused or reduced to one of these elements. It is not the imperial march of neoliberal economics—the so called "Golden Arches" theory of globalization. Neither should it be confused with a kind of military project, as though boots on the ground in Iraq or Afghanistan were evidence of an aggressive global hegemon. But globalization at the least involves these constituent elements. The shortage of social scientists in the series, as previously noted in a review by Jonathan Chaplin, remains a serious challenge.

This shortage is significant because it leaves major forces of contemporary globalization unexamined. Of particular impetus is the uncritical manner in which Stackhouse seems to adopt the economic and cultural principles of Thomas Friedman, and a variety of other economic and political heavy weights. Included among the assessments that he accepts is that "globalization is not impoverishing the poor, but rather raising a new middle class" (27), and that "inequality has temporarily increased" (28). These are not settled questions, at least not for Joseph Stiglitz. Yet in later passages Stackhouse suggests that consumerism and materialism are exacerbating the gap between rich and poor. It is not entirely clear what Stackhouse believes the state of the global economy is and, further, what the responsibility of public theology might be to speak to that context. This economic ambiguity is characteristic of the relationship of Stackhouse's public theology to the disciplines of social science generally in this last book.

Finally, what exactly is the precise nature of globalization that Stackhouse is suggesting can be aided by public theology? To his credit, Stackhouse makes an effort to develop this, giving explicit answer in several places. He writes that globalization is:

a potential civilization shift that involves the growth of a worldwide infrastructure that bears the prospect of a new form of civil society, one that may well comprehend all previous national, ethnic, political economic or cultural contexts. It portends a cosmopolitan possibility that modernity promised, but could not deliver, and thus can be considered the most profound postmodernism (2).

Later, he writes these forces "are creating a worldwide civil society that stands beyond the capacity of the nation-state to control" (8). The attentive reader will find this idea of an emergent, global civil society to be heavily influenced by Hardt and Negri's Empire and their ironically more obscure sequel, The Multitudes. Public theology is the tool by which this more inclusive civil society might emerge, a requisite foundation prior to which this newly emergent organism may not flourish. Stackhouse suggests that such an inclusive civil society is a precursor to the New Jerusalem, and the final and complete inclusion of all humanity in a global order. But what, if anything, does this civil society look like in international relations, and how exactly should public theology aid this task?

Stackhouse answers what I believe is the most pressing question of the series: What is the relationship between confessional and public theology? However, I wonder if the series would have benefitted had this fourth and final volume come first rather than last. Taking the principles which Stackhouse develops from the creation-fall-redemption framework, and working them through the various elements of contemporary globalization, would surely have profited the series as a whole. Only after this kind of theological work can analysis truly begin, and only subsequently can a more broadly based account of the nature of globalization unfold. However, I appreciate the vital contribution Stackhouse makes in Globalization and Grace, and the fine theological tools he sets forth to aid those of us thinking about globalization and global order. It stands as an excellent example of how we can think of religion and the global order from a Christian perspective. This book is essential reading for those of us thinking, working, and living in a globalized world and its contributions easily outweigh any shortcomings.


WRF Senior Fellow Dr. Jonathan Chaplin has also reviewed the God and Globalization series for Comment.

Robert Joustra Robert Joustra
Robert Joustra is an editor and researcher with Cardus. ... read more »

Posted in Globalization.

Add Your Comments


Copyright © 1974-2012 Cardus. All Rights Reserved.

| More

Feature Essays

  1. If Wishing Made it So: Teaching Students to Make Change

    May 14, 2012 | Gloria Stronks and Julia Stronks

    Parents and teachers want children to have the skills to make a difference. But what can we teach to help them survive their teen years, 20s, and 30s with convictions and charac...

Reviews & Opinions

  1. American Heretics

    May 23, 2012 | Kevin Flatt

    While too benevolent, and even-handed to a fault, Ross Douthat's Bad Religion offers diagnosis and prescriptions for American Christianity that are spot on.
  2. Do Not Open—No User Serviceable Parts Inside

    May 22, 2012 | David Greusel

    Why do so many of us have to work where the windows don't open? Engineers, architects, and lawyers have their reasons, but must workplaces be less humane than homes?

Six Questions

  1. Saying "there is not enough time" is heresy

    May 2, 2012 | Stephanie Gehring

    SIX QUESTIONS . . . The new culture I am making is an attempt to say hold still and look at this.

Cardus Blog

  1. A Heterosexual Problem

    May 23, 2012 | John Seel

    Marriage has a heterosexual problem. When the termites have done their work on the foundations of the home, it doesn't take much to knock it down. Such is the case of traditiona...
  2. Plus ca change

    May 22, 2012 | Peter Stockland

    On today's 100th day of protests by Quebec students, Journal de Montreal columnist Richard Martineau offers a scabrous depiction of his province. Citing former Laval University ...

Print Issue

  1. March 2012: Legacies
    Comment Magazine - Legacies Our culture does not know how to deal with legacies. We either treat the dead with some combination of awe and fear, or we think of our forebears as unworthy of remembrance, to ...