Comment Home / Reviews

Two shades of green

The green movement, as commonly understood, embodies one idea I believe Christians should heartily endorse, and one I believe we should equally heartily reject.

Without a doubt, "green" has become a major trend in recent years. It is hard to pick up a magazine or newspaper without seeing one or more articles on global climate change, green living, or sustainability. North American Christians have seemingly been of two minds on the topic, which I will caricature broadly. One group, which we might call traditional evangelicals, believe global climate change to be another leftist excuse for world government, and tend to be dismissive of the green movement. The other group, associated with younger and "emergent" congregations, have grabbed hold of environmental stewardship as one of many important causes that the traditional church has overlooked in its singular quest to save souls.

My view is that both camps are partly right, and both partly wrong. I am going to attempt to sketch a picture of an appropriate, Christian response to the issue of environmental stewardship, recognizing that this view will seem skewed to perhaps a majority of readers. I am not going to address the issue of global climate change per se, because I am not an expert, and because even experts disagree.

The green movement, as commonly understood, embodies one idea I believe Christians should heartily endorse, and one I believe we should equally heartily reject.


Light green

The idea under which we should join hands with environmentalists everywhere is the notion that we have a responsibility to care for the planet we have been given, and the accompanying recognition that, at least since the Industrial Revolution, we have not done a very good job of this. Creation care, as it is sometimes called, is a duty given to us in Genesis, when we were called, through our first parents, to cultivate and subdue the earth. In the last few centuries, though, Western society seems to have viewed "subdue" as a license to exploit and damage our terrestrial home. In my view, this exploitation has been a grievous sin, one in which the institutional church is implicated, and one for which we should be profoundly repentant. Repentance, I should point out, involves not only feeling sorry, but changing behaviors to pursue a different course.

The writer Wendell Berry has devoted much of his fiction and nonfiction work to this problem, the non-sustainabilty of industrialized agriculture, and I think that he gets a lot of things right. We should rethink the scale and technique of not just agriculture, but manufacturing, shipping, and the gigantism of modern economics as we seek to live our lives in ways better suited to preserving a heritage for those who will follow. Christians should be leaders in this movement, based on our understanding of the early chapters of Genesis. To shrug our way to giant discount stores in gas-guzzling SUVs to buy plastic, clamshell packages of cheap products made in China as "just the way things are" is a dangerous acquiescence in cultural misguidedness.


Yellow green

But there is a side to the green movement I believe to be mistaken, and one that I think Christians should actively oppose, even as we support more thoughtful, sustainable ways of life. That is the Malthusian view that we are exhausting the Earth's supply of resources and rushing headlong into a world of mass starvation. This is a difficult subject, and merits a more thorough analysis than can be given here, but I will put my argument forward briefly: our God is a god of abundance. He provides abundantly for all our needs for fresh air, fresh water, nutritious foods, and natural resources from which to fashion our lives.

This is not to say that drought does not sometimes result in catastrophic crop failure, or that human agency does not sometimes result in famine. Both these things happen, sometimes at a truly tragic scale. But in the main, sound husbandry will produce crops that yield "thirty, sixty, even a hundredfold" return on our investment. The message of global scarcity is a modern invention, and is not supported by what the Bible teaches. The problem we face is not so much a lack of resources as it is a lack of wisdom in their proper use. We are not running out of fresh water: the oceans are evaporating at the same rate they always have. We may hoard, waste, misuse, or pollute fresh water to our detriment, but we are not going to run out of it. Malthus was wrong, and more recently, Paul Erlich (of The Population Bomb fame) was wrong as well. I charge both authors with a lack of faith. Christians should embrace our role as careful and thoughtful stewards of this world while rejecting the fear-mongering that leads to unwise choices.


So then . . .

One might then ask how ought a thoughtful Christian to lead what might be called a life of fearless sustainability, or, put another way, to be green without being yellow? I think we should start by examining our own choices, with respect to use of fossil fuels, plastics, imported goods, long-distance shipping, and transportation. We can all be more thoughtful about the degree to which we participate in the degradation of the earth, whether by a Montana copper mine or a new factory in China. At the same time, I believe we need to spread a hopeful message of God's loving provision for our needs; that his eye truly is on the sparrow, and that as long as we are wise stewards, neither the sparrow nor the humans he cares infinitely more about will starve. These two ideas, I hope you see, are complementary, not contradictory, and I think they point a way forward for thoughtful Christians.

Help us spread the word:
David Greusel David Greusel
David Greusel has worked as an architect for more than thirty years with several Midwestern firms of varying sizes. ... read more »

Posted in Justice, Religion.

Subscribe to the Comment Weekly Newsletter
Comment's online articles serve as bridges between print issues. Get an email in your inbox every Friday, so you don't miss out.
  • Stay up-to-date and informed
  • Only one concise digest email per week
  • We will never share your email address. No Spam!
We will never sell or rent your email address. Your privacy is important to us

Related Articles

We'd love to hear your comments. Tell us what you think of this article! We'll use the best comments in Comment's print edition, and top commenters each month will receive a free, signed copy of our editor's recent book: Discipleship in the Present Tense.

Copyright © 1974-2014 Cardus. All Rights Reserved.

Features

  1. Who's Afraid of Secularism?

    August 21, 2014 | Robert Joustra

    If "strong civil religion tends to replace strong civil religion," what will this look like in a post-Christian America?

Reviews

  1. Beyond "Engagement": The Next Conversation We Need About Politics

    May 1, 2014 | James K.A. Smith

    Looking elsewhere for the robust embrace of politics that will speak today—to our time and place and audience.
  2. Getting Back to Place

    April 24, 2014 | Doug Sikkema

    Because place has such a power to shape, we must be mindful of how we shape our places.

Cardus Blog

  1. Expand the Inner Circles

    August 21, 2014 | Brian Dijkema

    Earlier this month, Robert George offered a bit of advice to young scholars. That advice, in a nutshell, is to be very wary of applause. "In the end," he says, "what matters ...
  2. Inside the Islamic State

    August 14, 2014 | Doug Sikkema

    If you haven't been following the five-part series The Islamic State put out by VICE News, you might consider it if you're interested in the shocking parade of stories coming ...

Print Issue

  1. September 2014: Cracks in the Secular
    Comment Magazine - Cracks in the Secular An injection of hope: the fall issue of Comment will seriously challenge and confront the attempt of some to reconfigure North American public life in a way that diminishes and ...
Comment on iPad