
Recent analysis of labour mobility in Canada categorizes barriers to labour mobility as either “natural, economic barriers” or “artificial barriers.” Natural, economic barriers include distance and linguistic-cultural differences, although language differences are affected by law and regulations. Artificial barriers to mobility are those imposed by law and regulation, including “professional occupational licensing, government occupational licensing of trades, preferential hiring practices, income security programs, education and language requirements, and employment standards legislation.”
Recent emphases in the development of public policy with respect to labour mobility have focused on the artificial barriers to labour mobility. These include a federation-wide, interprovincial mobility agreement across several sectors, bilateral provincial agreements, and both federal and provincial statutes on “internal” – that is, inter-provincial – trade including “credential recognition.” But aside from non-refundable tax credits in respect of moving expenses related to accepting employment, the Government of Canada no longer subsidizes labour mobility.
But nowhere has research been conducted in Canada with respect to the mobile worker’s motivation for moving to seek and to find work, the obstacles to worker mobility, nor with respect to developing a profile of the mobile worker. These studies seek, in part, to fill that gap.
Cardus prepared two investigative reports for the Construction Sector Council on labour mobility in Canada. The first, Working Mobile: A study of labour mobility in Canada's industrial construction sector is a comprehensive investigative research report that gives the construction industry a better understanding of the various factors relating to worker mobility in the large industrial and civil engineering sectors of the industry. Using a survey of mobile workers, the study analyzes results, and offers recommendations based on the survey findings.
The second, Working Local: A study of stationary labour in Canada's construction sector, expands on the findings made in Working Mobile, surveying local workers in Canada's industrial construction sector. Contact the Construction Sector Council to order a copy.
Ontario's College of Trades will not be effective in solving the very real problems with trades in Ontario, and will almost definitely increase the financial and regulatory burden on an already troubled sector. The COT is a far-reaching piece of legislation offering little confidence the College will objectively and responsibly manage Ontario's trades.
Flourishing social architecture depends on effective, collective voice.